Osage vs Immigrants from North America 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,602 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 91.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,241,912 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 91.4%, a difference of 0.030%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Osage	Immigrants from North America
Minimum	86.7%	81.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	13.3%	18.4%
Mean	95.2%	95.2%
Median	95.3%	95.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	93.7%	92.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	97.8%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.3%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.3%	4.9%

Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from North America by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Germany (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Canada (91.4%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Bhutanese (91.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish American (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (91.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 91.5%
Bolivians	99.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	99.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 91.4%
Lebanese	99.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| England	99.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 91.4%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 91.4%
Tsimshian	99.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 91.4%
Osage	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 91.4%
Spanish Americans	99.2 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 91.4%
Bangladeshis	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 91.4%
Bhutanese	99.2 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| North America	99.2 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 91.3%
Austrians	99.0 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 91.3%
Potawatomi	99.0 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 91.3%
Pakistanis	99.0 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 91.3%
Slavs	98.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 91.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	98.6 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 91.2%