Norwegian vs Pennsylvania German 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Norwegian
Pennsylvania German
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Norwegians
Pennsylvania Germans
93.7%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
89.3%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
22.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Pennsylvania German 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,998,902 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680 and weighted average of 93.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,072,991 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 89.3%, a difference of 5.0%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 88.8% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 11.2% | 66.7% |
Mean | 95.9% | 83.3% |
Median | 95.5% | 89.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 94.4% | 73.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.6% | 94.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are German (93.6%, a difference of 0.050%), English (93.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (93.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Danish (93.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Scottish (93.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 94.8% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 93.8% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 93.7% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 93.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 93.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 93.5% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 93.4% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 93.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 93.3% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 93.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 93.3% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 93.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 93.1% |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 93.1% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 93.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Asia (89.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (89.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Crow (89.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (89.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (89.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Poland | 37.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 89.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 36.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 89.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 35.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 89.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 33.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 89.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 31.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 89.4% |
Crow | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 89.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 23.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 89.3% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 89.3% |
Immigrants | Asia | 22.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 89.3% |
Central Americans | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 89.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 89.2% |
Iroquois | 19.8 /100 | #202 | Poor 89.2% |
Cambodians | 18.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 89.2% |
Romanians | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 89.2% |
Guatemalans | 17.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 89.2% |