Danish vs Yakama No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Danish
Yakama
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Danes
Yakama
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Yakama No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,573,050 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,905,065 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 0.35%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Yakama |
Minimum | 0.32% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 13.6% | 11.5% |
Range | 13.3% | 10.0% |
Mean | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 3.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Yakama by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are English (6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.3%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are German (6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |