Crow vs Immigrants from Brazil No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Crow
Immigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Crow
Immigrants from Brazil
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Immigrants from Brazil No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,160,516 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,931,543 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Immigrants from Brazil |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 26.1% | 35.7% |
| Range | 25.1% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 9.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Immigrants from Brazil by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Western Asia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Apache (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Ukrainian (10.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
| Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |