Seminole vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,904,631 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.289 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,793,193 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.60%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Seminole	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	2.8%	3.1%
Maximum	71.2%	33.3%
Range	68.4%	30.2%
Mean	14.3%	14.7%
Median	11.0%	14.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.1%	11.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.0%	16.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.9%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.9%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.7%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Seminole and Immigrants from South Africa by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (10.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (10.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Hungarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Romania (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and French Canadian (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Seminole	84.2 /100 \| #131	Excellent 10.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	84.0 /100 \| #132	Excellent 10.1%
Austrians	83.9 /100 \| #133	Excellent 10.2%
Romanians	83.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 10.2%
Comanche	83.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	82.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| North America	82.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 10.2%
Burmese	82.3 /100 \| #138	Excellent 10.2%
Uruguayans	81.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Austria	81.4 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	81.4 /100 \| #141	Excellent 10.2%
Slovaks	80.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	79.0 /100 \| #143	Good 10.2%
Brazilians	78.4 /100 \| #144	Good 10.2%
Argentineans	78.0 /100 \| #145	Good 10.2%
Asians	77.7 /100 \| #146	Good 10.2%
French Canadians	77.5 /100 \| #147	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	75.7 /100 \| #148	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Scotland	74.6 /100 \| #149	Good 10.2%
Hungarians	74.4 /100 \| #150	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| South Africa	73.6 /100 \| #151	Good 10.2%