Immigrants from Uganda vs Slavic Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,060,042 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,860,466 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uganda	Slavic
Minimum	0.80%	1.9%
Maximum	15.0%	35.7%
Range	14.2%	33.8%
Mean	5.3%	8.5%
Median	4.8%	6.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	4.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.1%	9.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.6%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	7.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Slavs by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Liberia (4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Jordan (4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Oceania (4.7%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Tongan (4.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (4.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (4.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Potawatomi (4.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slovak (4.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Slavs	99.5 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 4.6%
Tongans	99.5 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	99.5 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 4.6%
Northern Europeans	99.3 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 4.6%
Potawatomi	99.3 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 4.6%
Slovaks	99.3 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	99.2 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 4.6%
Seminole	99.2 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 4.7%
Irish	99.2 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 4.7%
Icelanders	99.1 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 4.7%
Iroquois	99.1 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 4.7%
Okinawans	99.1 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.1 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 4.7%
Thais	98.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	98.9 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.9 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.8 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.7 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	98.7 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Liberia	98.7 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Uganda	98.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 4.7%