Immigrants from Uganda vs Choctaw Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,127,116 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,014,089 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uganda	Choctaw
Minimum	0.50%	0.86%
Maximum	13.9%	50.0%
Range	13.4%	49.1%
Mean	5.1%	8.2%
Median	4.9%	5.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.7%	3.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.6%	8.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.8%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	9.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Choctaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Kenya (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Austria (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Sioux (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from India (5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Austria (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Sioux (5.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 5.0%
Nepalese	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 5.1%
Ugandans	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 5.1%
Jordanians	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 5.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| India	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 5.1%
Sioux	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 5.1%
Choctaw	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Austria	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 5.1%
Europeans	99.6 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	99.6 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.6 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 5.1%
Carpatho Rusyns	99.6 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 5.1%
Swedes	99.5 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 5.1%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 5.1%