Immigrants from Turkey vs Finnish Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,028,802 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 356,249,790 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.28%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Turkey	Finnish
Minimum	1.4%	0.50%
Maximum	12.7%	59.9%
Range	11.3%	59.4%
Mean	6.3%	9.5%
Median	5.5%	6.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.6%	4.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.5%	11.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.9%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	9.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	9.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Finns by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Okinawan (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Scotland (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Germany (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Thailand (5.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Eastern European (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Seminole (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (5.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Czechoslovakians	96.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.0%
South Africans	96.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.0%
Romanians	95.5 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.0%
Yugoslavians	95.4 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Thailand	95.4 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	94.7 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Turkey	94.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Germany	93.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	92.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.0%
Finns	92.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.0%
Eastern Europeans	92.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.0%
Seminole	91.4 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	91.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.0%
Celtics	91.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	91.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.0%
Malaysians	90.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.1%
Soviet Union	90.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.1%