Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Arapaho Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,646,397 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,169,657 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Arapaho
Minimum	3.2%	3.1%
Maximum	33.6%	100.0%
Range	30.4%	96.9%
Mean	11.1%	37.9%
Median	9.4%	19.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	5.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.4%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.7%	94.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.1%	43.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	40.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Arapaho by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belgium (8.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Nicaraguan (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Burmese (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are U.S. Virgin Islander (8.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bhutanese (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Australia (8.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Australia	99.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 8.0%
Cubans	99.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 8.0%
Bhutanese	99.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 8.0%
Arapaho	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 8.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 8.1%
Basques	99.5 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 8.1%
New Zealanders	99.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 8.1%
Egyptians	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 8.1%
Venezuelans	99.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 8.1%
Nicaraguans	99.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Belgium	99.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 8.2%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 8.2%