Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Arapaho Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,895,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,169,657 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 1.5%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kazakhstan	Arapaho
Minimum	2.1%	3.1%
Maximum	56.9%	100.0%
Range	54.8%	96.9%
Mean	15.5%	37.9%
Median	11.2%	19.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.7%	5.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.5%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	94.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.4%	43.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.2%	40.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Arapaho by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Burmese (8.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (8.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Belgium (8.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are U.S. Virgin Islander (8.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bhutanese (8.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Singapore (8.1%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Cubans	99.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 8.0%
Bhutanese	99.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 8.0%
Arapaho	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 8.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 8.1%
Basques	99.5 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 8.1%
New Zealanders	99.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 8.1%
Egyptians	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 8.1%
Venezuelans	99.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 8.1%
Nicaraguans	99.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Belgium	99.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 8.2%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.2 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 8.2%