Immigrants from Norway vs British West Indian Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,216,399 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,084,250 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Norway	British West Indian
Minimum	5.9%	1.0%
Maximum	84.2%	38.3%
Range	78.3%	37.3%
Mean	32.8%	11.8%
Median	17.7%	9.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.8%	7.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.3%	13.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	54.6%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	30.3%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	28.6%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and British West Indians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Luxembourger (7.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (7.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Ugandan (7.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Pueblo (7.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%