Immigrants from Iran vs Cambodian Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,197,010 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,067,296 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 1.0%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Iran	Cambodian
Minimum	1.0%	3.8%
Maximum	48.1%	46.7%
Range	47.1%	42.9%
Mean	10.4%	14.2%
Median	7.8%	10.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.5%	5.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.3%	16.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	11.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.9%	12.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.9%	12.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iran and Cambodians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Israel (7.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Barbados (7.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (7.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and South African (7.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eritrea (7.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Norway (7.7%, a difference of 0.45%), Guyanese (7.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Luxembourger (7.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 7.3%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%