Immigrants from Chile vs Guyanese Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,456,025 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,232,010 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Guyanese
Minimum	4.2%	1.0%
Maximum	69.3%	50.0%
Range	65.1%	49.0%
Mean	20.5%	11.2%
Median	14.9%	9.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.8%	6.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	27.6%	12.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.7%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.0%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.3%	7.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Guyanese by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.63%), British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (7.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%