Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Guyanese Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,402,659 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,232,010 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 5.5%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uzbekistan	Guyanese
Minimum	0.70%	1.0%
Maximum	27.0%	50.0%
Range	26.3%	49.0%
Mean	9.1%	11.2%
Median	8.4%	9.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	6.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.9%	12.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	7.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Guyanese by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Zaire (7.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Switzerland (7.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Armenian (7.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Seminole (7.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chickasaw (7.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Israel (7.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Ute	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 6.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 7.0%
Seminole	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 7.1%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 7.2%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 7.2%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 7.3%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%