Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Cape Verdean Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,190,572 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,523,117 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Cabo Verde	Cape Verdean
Minimum	0.90%	0.90%
Maximum	8.3%	34.0%
Range	7.4%	33.1%
Mean	4.4%	5.4%
Median	4.2%	4.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.0%	2.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.4%	5.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	2.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.0%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.0%	5.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Cape Verdeans by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde are Afghan (4.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Tsimshian (4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovene (4.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Zaire (4.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (4.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Afghan (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zaire (4.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Tsimshian (4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Slovene (4.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (4.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.3%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.3%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.3%
Sudanese	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.3%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.4%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 4.4%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 4.4%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 4.4%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 4.4%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 4.4%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 4.5%
Cubans	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 4.5%