Immigrants from Australia vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,859,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 353,897,450 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.090%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Czechoslovakian
Minimum	3.4%	2.9%
Maximum	43.0%	100.0%
Range	39.6%	97.1%
Mean	13.7%	23.9%
Median	10.0%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.1%	10.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.8%	27.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	16.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.4%	21.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.3%	20.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Kenyan (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (9.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Chickasaw (9.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Welsh	99.3 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 9.8%
Scottish	99.3 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 9.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.2 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 9.9%
Mongolians	99.1 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 9.9%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.0 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 9.9%
Celtics	98.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 9.9%
Bolivians	98.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 9.9%
Kenyans	98.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	98.7 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 9.9%
Czechoslovakians	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 9.9%
Chickasaw	98.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 9.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 9.9%
Icelanders	98.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.2 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 9.9%
Yaqui	98.0 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 9.9%
Sri Lankans	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 9.9%
Latvians	97.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 9.9%
New Zealanders	97.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 9.9%