Czech vs Hmong Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Czech
Hmong
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Czechs
Hmong
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Hmong Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 413,421,008 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,334,539 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 11.0%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Hmong |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 35.5% | 12.0% |
Range | 35.1% | 11.5% |
Mean | 7.1% | 4.6% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Hmong by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Lebanese (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eritrea (4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Creek (4.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (4.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 4.0%), Chickasaw (4.4%, a difference of 4.1%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Congo (4.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |