Crow vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
COMPARE
Crow
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Comparison
Crow
Chickasaw
15.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,626,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,835,507 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 219.1%.

Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 64.2% | 60.0% |
Range | 59.3% | 58.0% |
Mean | 22.0% | 9.0% |
Median | 20.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.3% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.7% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Demographics Similar to Crow by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yuman (16.9%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (14.4%, a difference of 8.8%), Pima (11.8%, a difference of 33.6%), Arapaho (10.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and Navajo (9.3%, a difference of 68.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.5% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.6% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 9.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 10.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 14.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Moroccan (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), American (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Sierra Leonean (4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants (4.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 4.9% |
Fijians | 8.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 4.9% |
Osage | 8.6 /100 | #213 | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 8.0 /100 | #215 | Tragic 4.9% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #216 | Tragic 4.9% |
Moroccans | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 4.9% |
Chickasaw | 5.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 4.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 4.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 4.7 /100 | #220 | Tragic 4.9% |
Bermudans | 3.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.0% |
Hmong | 3.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.0% |
Panamanians | 2.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.0% |