Chinese vs Sudanese Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Sudanese
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Comparison
Chinese
Sudanese
4.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Sudanese Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,952,421 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,864,294 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 8.7%.
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 18.5% |
Range | 15.8% | 17.8% |
Mean | 4.9% | 5.3% |
Median | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Sudanese by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (4.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from the Azores (4.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Fijian (3.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Congo (4.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and Lumbee (4.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (4.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Norwegian (4.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Chickasaw (4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years |
Marshallese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.4% |