Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,013,738 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,859,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.11%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	3.6%	3.4%
Maximum	30.2%	43.0%
Range	26.6%	39.6%
Mean	14.0%	13.7%
Median	11.9%	10.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.3%	8.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.5%	18.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.2%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.8%	8.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	8.3%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Czechoslovakian (9.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (9.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Icelander (9.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Scottish	99.3 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 9.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.2 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 9.9%
Mongolians	99.1 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 9.9%
Bulgarians	99.1 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.0 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 9.9%
Celtics	98.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 9.9%
Bolivians	98.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 9.9%
Kenyans	98.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	98.7 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 9.9%
Czechoslovakians	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 9.9%
Chickasaw	98.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 9.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 9.9%
Icelanders	98.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.2 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 9.9%
Yaqui	98.0 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 9.9%
Sri Lankans	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 9.9%
Latvians	97.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 9.9%
New Zealanders	97.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	97.5 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.0%