Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,376,802 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,859,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.73%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	1.8%	3.4%
Maximum	31.8%	43.0%
Range	30.0%	39.6%
Mean	11.6%	13.7%
Median	11.3%	10.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.8%	8.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.6%	18.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.8%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	8.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	8.3%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Australia by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Bangladeshi (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Polish (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Laos (9.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (9.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (9.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Kenyans	98.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	98.7 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 9.9%
Czechoslovakians	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 9.9%
Chickasaw	98.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 9.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 9.9%
Icelanders	98.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.2 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 9.9%
Yaqui	98.0 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 9.9%
Sri Lankans	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 9.9%
Latvians	97.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 9.9%
New Zealanders	97.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 9.9%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	97.5 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	97.4 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 10.0%
Poles	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 10.0%
Macedonians	97.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 10.0%
Chileans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 10.0%
Bhutanese	96.9 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 10.0%
Bangladeshis	96.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 10.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	96.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 10.0%