Celtic vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,481,769 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,987,813 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.49%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic	Immigrants from Scotland
Minimum	3.2%	1.4%
Maximum	44.1%	38.0%
Range	40.9%	36.6%
Mean	13.2%	7.8%
Median	8.7%	5.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.8%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.1%	8.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.4%	3.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.0%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.9%	6.9%

Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Scotland by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Seminole (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Malaysian (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
South Africans	96.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.0%
Romanians	95.5 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.0%
Yugoslavians	95.4 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Thailand	95.4 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	94.7 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Turkey	94.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Germany	93.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	92.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.0%
Finns	92.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.0%
Eastern Europeans	92.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.0%
Seminole	91.4 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	91.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.0%
Celtics	91.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	91.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.0%
Malaysians	90.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.1%
Soviet Union	90.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Canada	89.7 /100 \| #119	Excellent 5.1%