Cambodian vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,038,511 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,573,819 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 3.4%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cambodian	Immigrants from Congo
Minimum	1.1%	2.3%
Maximum	47.7%	38.5%
Range	46.6%	36.2%
Mean	12.6%	9.8%
Median	9.1%	9.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.0%	6.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	11.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	4.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.7%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.5%	6.2%

Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Immigrants from Congo by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Scandinavian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Cuban (9.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Sudan (9.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Danish (9.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Czech (9.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Cubans	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 9.2%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 9.2%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 9.3%
Immigrants \| Sudan	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 9.3%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 9.3%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 9.3%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 9.4%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 9.4%
Osage	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 9.4%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 9.4%
Taiwanese	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 9.4%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 9.5%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 9.5%
Scandinavians	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 9.5%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 9.5%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 9.5%