Zimbabwean vs Turkish Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Turkish
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Zimbabweans
Turks
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Turkish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.010%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 14.9% | 16.7% |
| Range | 14.3% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 7.6% |
| Median | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Turks by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.070%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |