Zimbabwean vs Norwegian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Norwegian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Zimbabweans
Norwegians
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Norwegian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,518,584 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 5.8%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 14.9% | 33.3% |
| Range | 14.3% | 32.2% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 8.2% |
| Median | 8.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Norwegians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Maltese (8.9%, a difference of 0.66%), Danish (9.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |