Yuman vs Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Yuman
Chilean
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Yuman
Chileans
13.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
27.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,596,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,180,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 17.1%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Chilean |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 44.7% |
| Range | 27.1% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 11.2% |
| Median | 12.0% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Mexican (13.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from El Salvador (13.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Paiute (12.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Taiwanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Albanian (11.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 37.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 36.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 35.7 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 34.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 32.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.1% |
| Taiwanese | 29.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.2% |
| Chileans | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.2% |
| Albanians | 24.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 21.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
| Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |