South African vs Immigrants from Canada Single Mother Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,638,644 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 28.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,447,925 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 0.26%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	South African	Immigrants from Canada
Minimum	15.5%	24.7%
Maximum	36.4%	100.0%
Range	20.9%	75.3%
Mean	27.7%	63.5%
Median	28.0%	55.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	22.2%	34.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.3%	98.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.2%	63.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.6%	29.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.4%	29.1%

Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Canada by Single Mother Poverty

In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from North America (28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (28.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Danish (28.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Denmark (28.5%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Native Hawaiian (28.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Spain (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belgium (28.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Morocco (28.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Mother Poverty
South Americans	90.4 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 28.4%
Norwegians	90.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Austria	90.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.5 /100 \| #132	Excellent 28.4%
Swedes	89.4 /100 \| #133	Excellent 28.4%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	89.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 28.4%
Immigrants \| Spain	89.2 /100 \| #135	Excellent 28.4%
Native Hawaiians	88.9 /100 \| #136	Excellent 28.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	88.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 28.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	88.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 28.5%
Samoans	88.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Colombia	88.0 /100 \| #140	Excellent 28.5%
Danes	87.1 /100 \| #141	Excellent 28.5%
South Africans	86.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| North America	86.5 /100 \| #143	Excellent 28.5%
Luxembourgers	86.4 /100 \| #144	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| South America	86.1 /100 \| #145	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Denmark	86.1 /100 \| #146	Excellent 28.5%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	85.3 /100 \| #147	Excellent 28.6%
Syrians	85.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 28.6%
Serbians	85.0 /100 \| #149	Excellent 28.6%