Russian vs Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Russian
Celtic
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Russians
Celtics
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
18.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Celtic Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,244,967 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,160,308 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 21.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Celtic |
Minimum | 4.6% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 83.9% | 62.3% |
Range | 79.3% | 56.5% |
Mean | 22.8% | 25.8% |
Median | 14.8% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.4% | 13.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Demographics Similar to Russians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Tsimshian (14.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Laotian (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Philippines (14.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Soviet Union | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tsimshian | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.4 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.4 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Hungarian (17.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Iraqi (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Ugandan (18.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 27.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 27.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 25.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.7% |
French Canadians | 24.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.7% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.9% |
Celtics | 18.3 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.9% |
Hungarians | 18.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.9% |
Iraqis | 14.0 /100 | #200 | Poor 18.0% |
Ugandans | 13.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 18.0% |
Japanese | 13.8 /100 | #202 | Poor 18.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 13.7 /100 | #203 | Poor 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 13.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 18.1% |
Spaniards | 12.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 18.1% |