Nonimmigrants vs Tsimshian Poverty
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Tsimshian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Tsimshian
13.3%
POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Tsimshian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,909,037 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.307 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Maximum | 65.6% | 24.7% |
| Range | 58.1% | 17.4% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Median | 13.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and Tsimshian by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.82%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.98%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Spaniards | 16.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
| Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
| Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |