Mexican vs Arapaho Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Mexican
Arapaho
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Mexicans
Arapaho
20.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Arapaho Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,930,969 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,689,796 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 21.7%, a difference of 4.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 11.4% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 54.6% | 80.0% |
| Range | 43.2% | 73.0% |
| Mean | 23.5% | 31.1% |
| Median | 21.5% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 36.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 18.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 17.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Arapaho by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Inupiat (20.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and Dutch West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |