Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,735,156 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,183,759 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Jamaica
Minimum	2.8%	1.3%
Maximum	87.0%	100.0%
Range	84.2%	98.7%
Mean	27.5%	19.0%
Median	19.6%	17.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.8%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.3%	20.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	18.6%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.6%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.4%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Jamaica by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Armenian (18.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (18.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (18.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (18.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Polish (18.8%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Iraq (18.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Burmese (18.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Croatian (19.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 18.7%
Immigrants \| Haiti	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 18.7%
Armenians	99.7 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 18.7%
Lithuanians	99.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 18.7%
Hawaiians	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 18.7%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 18.8%
Costa Ricans	99.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 18.8%
Uruguayans	99.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 18.8%
Palestinians	99.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 18.8%
Japanese	99.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 18.9%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 18.9%
Croatians	99.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	99.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 19.0%
Afghans	99.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 19.0%