Jordanian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,137,509 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,147,283 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Jordanian	Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Minimum	3.1%	6.9%
Maximum	33.3%	33.9%
Range	30.2%	27.0%
Mean	17.9%	16.6%
Median	18.2%	15.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.2%	12.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.4%	20.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.2%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.4%	6.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.4%	6.2%

Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Scotland (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Korea (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Belarus (18.5%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Samoan (18.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (18.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Sri Lankan (18.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Ireland (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Italian (18.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 18.3%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 18.4%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 18.4%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 18.4%
Egyptians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 18.5%
Greeks	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 18.6%
Jordanians	99.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 18.6%
Brazilians	99.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 18.6%