Immigrants from Peru vs Puget Sound Salish Single Father Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,878,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,233,093 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.2%.

Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Peru	Puget Sound Salish
Minimum	5.8%	2.0%
Maximum	60.7%	57.1%
Range	55.0%	55.1%
Mean	18.1%	24.8%
Median	15.7%	20.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.2%	12.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.9%	40.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.7%	28.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.1%	15.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.0%	15.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru and Puget Sound Salish by Single Father Poverty

In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Japan (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Turkey (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Maltese (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Kenyan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (15.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (15.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Bangladeshi (15.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Father Poverty
Hawaiians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 15.1%
Guamanians/Chamorros	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 15.1%
Puget Sound Salish	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 15.2%
Bangladeshis	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 15.2%
Paraguayans	99.7 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 15.2%
Japanese	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 15.2%
Mongolians	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.6 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.6 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 15.3%
Kenyans	99.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 15.3%
Maltese	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Peru	99.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	99.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 15.3%