Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Cape Verdean Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Cape Verdean
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Cape Verdeans
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Cape Verdean Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,234,574 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,439,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 31.8% | 31.5% |
| Range | 31.0% | 30.5% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 10.5% |
| Median | 10.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cape Verdeans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Comanche (11.0%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |