Immigrants from Israel vs Italian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,961,742 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.69%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Israel	Italian
Minimum	0.66%	2.0%
Maximum	60.7%	100.0%
Range	60.0%	98.0%
Mean	13.5%	14.4%
Median	10.9%	10.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.0%	7.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.9%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.0%	16.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.9%	16.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Italians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.4 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Croatians	99.3 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.3 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.2%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.2%
Greeks	99.2 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Israel	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.1 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%