Immigrants from Germany vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
Immigrants from Jordan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
Immigrants from Jordan
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
POVERTY
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,719,504 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,257,123 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.2% |
| Range | 94.2% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 12.0% |
| Median | 12.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany and Immigrants from Jordan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Chilean (11.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |