Immigrants from Egypt vs British Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,739,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 515,985,739 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.040%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Egypt	British
Minimum	1.4%	4.7%
Maximum	42.5%	100.0%
Range	41.1%	95.3%
Mean	15.2%	38.9%
Median	13.8%	22.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.0%	11.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.0%	73.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.0%	62.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.7%	36.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.5%	35.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and British by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from North Macedonia (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (15.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Finnish (14.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Sri Lankan (14.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Italy (14.9%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from North Macedonia (14.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from France (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Finnish (14.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Chilean (15.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Belarus (15.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Northern Europeans	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| North America	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Argentina	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	97.1 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Paraguayans	96.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.9%
Argentineans	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Sri Lankans	96.7 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Finns	96.5 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	96.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Egypt	96.2 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
British	96.2 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| France	96.1 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Chileans	95.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	95.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	95.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Dutch	95.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.0%
Serbians	95.2 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Jordanians	95.1 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%