Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Jamaican Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 480,513,058 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,459,370 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 1.4%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Eastern Asia	Jamaican
Minimum	3.2%	1.5%
Maximum	38.3%	44.3%
Range	35.1%	42.8%
Mean	17.8%	17.2%
Median	18.4%	17.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.6%	13.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.9%	21.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.5%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.5%	6.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Jamaicans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Syrian (19.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (19.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Turkish (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%