Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Israeli Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Israeli
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Israelis
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Israeli Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,242,933 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,005,124 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Israeli |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 28.0% | 27.1% |
Range | 26.2% | 26.4% |
Mean | 11.7% | 10.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Israelis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kuwait (13.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Syria (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and South American (13.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |