Immigrants from China vs Bolivian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Bolivian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Bolivians
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Bolivian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,043,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.29%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Bolivian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 43.1% |
Range | 27.7% | 42.4% |
Mean | 11.7% | 11.7% |
Median | 11.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Bolivians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Latvian (13.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |