Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Australia
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Australia
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Australia Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,602,461 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 2.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 1.6% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.7% | 95.1% |
Mean | 11.7% | 21.5% |
Median | 11.0% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 21.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Australia by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Eastern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Luxembourger (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |