Immigrants from Chile vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,013,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,021,378 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Pennsylvania German
Minimum	5.3%	1.4%
Maximum	53.8%	100.0%
Range	48.5%	98.6%
Mean	18.9%	23.9%
Median	16.9%	17.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.8%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.4%	23.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.7%	9.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.9%	22.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.6%	22.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Panama (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cambodian (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cape Verdean (19.4%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Morocco (19.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Austrian (19.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Cambodians	94.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 19.4%
Paraguayans	94.6 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	94.3 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Panama	94.0 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Russia	93.7 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 19.4%
Cape Verdeans	93.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 19.4%
Slovaks	92.9 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| England	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.9 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 19.5%
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%