Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turkish Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,470,842 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,666,868 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Turkish
Minimum	6.0%	2.6%
Maximum	44.9%	46.5%
Range	38.8%	43.9%
Mean	18.9%	17.3%
Median	17.1%	16.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.1%	10.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.2%	19.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	9.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.8%	9.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	9.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Turks by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Russian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| England	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.9 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 19.5%
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%
Soviet Union	92.0 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 19.5%
Russians	91.5 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 19.5%
Austrians	90.7 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	89.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 19.6%
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%