Immigrants from Bahamas vs Spanish American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Spanish American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Spanish American Indians
11.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Spanish American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,583,559 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,121,787 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 42.1% |
Range | 24.7% | 37.8% |
Mean | 12.3% | 12.4% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Spanish American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Somali (11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |