Egyptian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
10.3%
MALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,705,416 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,776,371 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 34.6% | 23.0% |
| Range | 33.4% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 8.4% |
| Median | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Belgian (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (10.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from England (10.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Finnish (10.5%, a difference of 0.57%), Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Egyptians | 95.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 95.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |