Costa Rican vs Indian (Asian) Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Indian (Asian)
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Costa Ricans
Indians (Asian)
11.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
17.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
34.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Indian (Asian) Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,079,970 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,457,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.37% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 31.1% |
Range | 34.0% | 28.6% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.6% |
Median | 10.2% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Indians (Asian) by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Zaire (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Choctaw (11.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Laos (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uganda (11.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 37.5 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 37.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 36.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 35.7 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 34.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 32.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.1% |
Taiwanese | 29.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.2% |
Chileans | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.2% |
Bangladeshis | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.2% |
Albanians | 24.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 21.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
Costa Ricans | 17.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 16.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.3% |
Israelis | 16.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.3% |
Brazilians | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.3% |
Choctaw | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.4% |