Chinese vs Immigrants from Uruguay Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Uruguay
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Uruguay
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Uruguay Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,124,397 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Uruguay |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 85.0% | 28.4% |
| Range | 84.1% | 21.7% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 17.6% |
| Median | 14.7% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Uruguay by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belgium (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Yaqui (15.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |