Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City

18.8%
62.2%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 64157 62.2% 30.2% (+32.0)#39 33.4% (+28.8)#953
2. 64119 59.2% 30.2% (+29.0)#58 33.4% (+25.8)#1,643
3. 64155 58.4% 30.2% (+28.2)#64 33.4% (+25.0)#1,846
4. 64123 53.8% 30.2% (+23.6)#94 33.4% (+20.4)#3,231
5. 64127 53.4% 30.2% (+23.2)#99 33.4% (+20.0)#3,381
6. 64156 53.3% 30.2% (+23.1)#100 33.4% (+19.9)#3,423
7. 64138 50.1% 30.2% (+19.9)#122 33.4% (+16.7)#4,521
8. 64131 45.6% 30.2% (+15.4)#158 33.4% (+12.2)#6,174
9. 64134 42.5% 30.2% (+12.3)#180 33.4% (+9.10)#7,342
10. 64109 40.0% 30.2% (+9.80)#197 33.4% (+6.60)#8,385
11. 64113 38.7% 30.2% (+8.50)#207 33.4% (+5.30)#8,937
12. 64124 38.4% 30.2% (+8.20)#209 33.4% (+5.00)#9,084
13. 64133 37.2% 30.2% (+7.00)#219 33.4% (+3.80)#9,596
14. 64112 35.5% 30.2% (+5.30)#231 33.4% (+2.10)#10,345
15. 64106 35.0% 30.2% (+4.80)#237 33.4% (+1.60)#10,534
16. 64151 33.3% 30.2% (+3.10)#254 33.4% (-0.100)#11,260
17. 64108 33.2% 30.2% (+3.00)#256 33.4% (-0.200)#11,308
18. 64114 31.4% 30.2% (+1.20)#268 33.4% (-2.00)#12,049
19. 64111 30.0% 30.2% (-0.200)#280 33.4% (-3.40)#12,591
20. 64116 28.9% 30.2% (-1.30)#289 33.4% (-4.50)#13,008
21. 64105 28.3% 30.2% (-1.90)#295 33.4% (-5.10)#13,256
22. 64118 27.8% 30.2% (-2.40)#299 33.4% (-5.60)#13,395
23. 64137 26.3% 30.2% (-3.90)#315 33.4% (-7.10)#13,933
24. 64110 22.9% 30.2% (-7.30)#339 33.4% (-10.5)#14,921
25. 64152 21.4% 30.2% (-8.80)#360 33.4% (-12.0)#15,617
26. 64128 21.0% 30.2% (-9.20)#363 33.4% (-12.4)#15,797
27. 64145 20.8% 30.2% (-9.40)#366 33.4% (-12.6)#15,941
28. 64132 18.8% 30.2% (-11.4)#382 33.4% (-14.6)#16,586

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO are:
#1
62.2%
#2
59.2%
#3
58.4%
#4
53.8%
#5
53.4%
#6
53.3%
#7
50.1%
#8
45.6%
#9
42.5%
#10
40.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
64157 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO with 62.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City, MO?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas City is 30.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Missouri?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Missouri is 30.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.