Tsimshian vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Norwegian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Tsimshian
Norwegians
85.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,837 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 85.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,518,250 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Norwegian |
Minimum | 50.0% | 68.6% |
Maximum | 93.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.3% | 31.4% |
Mean | 79.7% | 89.6% |
Median | 80.3% | 88.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 75.2% | 85.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.7% | 94.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Norwegians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Latvia (85.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Paraguayan (85.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (85.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Liberia (85.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Serbian (85.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Ugandan (85.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Estonians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |