Polish vs Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Polish
Yugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Poles
Yugoslavians
80.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Yugoslavian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,599,725 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 80.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,716,744 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 39.8% | 51.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.2% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 80.8% | 78.9% |
| Median | 81.1% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 78.7% | 76.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.6% | 84.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Yugoslavians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Venezuela (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Chilean (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Malaysia (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uruguay (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Asia (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | Japan | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Colombians | 97.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Jordanians | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 97.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Croatians | 97.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Chileans | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 96.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Poles | 96.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Uruguayans | 96.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Ghanaians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 96.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| South Americans | 95.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.8 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Filipinos | 95.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Palestinians | 95.5 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 80.0% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 95.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 80.0% |